Question 14 (Mandatory) (2 points) Saved In the case of Hamer v. Sidway, the court found that there was no legally sufficient consideration to support the uncle's promise to pay the nephew if he did not smoke, drink, or gamble for a certain period of time because the nephew's refraining from drinking, smoking, or gambling provided no tangible benefit of legal value to the uncle. True False Question 15 (Mandatory) (1 point) Saved The peppercorn theory of consideration always requires an analysis of whether the amount of consideration is fair. True False