Question 16 3 pts If we assume capital rationing to be a reasonable perspective, which of the following statements regarding NPV projects is most accurate for a firm considering its currently available projects? O A company might decide to forego available positive NPV projects when it sees other potential projects on its horizon. Since there is a practical limit, and higher risk, to how many projects a firm might undertake at one time, capital rationing suggests that ignoring a current, positive-NPV project may be the best thing to do.. O A company should always decide to undertake all projects that are forecast to return a positive NPV, regardless of other considerations. When a project is forecast to have a positive NPV, its cost of capital calculation already includes metrics of risk, and therefore a positive NPV is determinative that a project should be done under capital rationing. O A company might decide to undertake multiple projects this period, including a project that is forecast to return a negative NPV so long as the negative-NPV project boosts sales projections in the long-term for the positive-NPV projects of the firm. A company should always decide to conduct projects that help build the size (market share) of the company, regardless of whether the projects demonstrate a positive or negative NPV forecast. Capital rationing dictates that growing market share will allow the company to press other advantages in the long-term whose value cannot be quantified in the short term