Question $22$

$3$ pts

Why are negative rights, on the whole, supposed to be stronger $($i$.$e$.$ harder to override$)$ than positive rights?

Because rights correspond to obligations, and obligations of non$-$interference are more important.

Because violating a negative right is begin the agent of another's death, and that's the worst possible outcome for another. $q,$

receive assistance they are due.

Because your freedom is more important than getting what you are owed.