Question 2 (2.5 points)

The claim of self-defense was first recognized:

Question 2 options:

	in the Model Penal Code.
	under common law.
	in the Bill of Rights.
	in the U.S. Code.

Question 3 (2.5 points)

__________ refers to a group of defenses in which the defendant claims that his/her actions were right or justified based on the circumstances.

Question 3 options:

	Justification
	Non-exculpatory defenses
	Excuse defenses
	Affirmative defense

Question 4 (2.5 points)

__________ refers to a potential defense to a crime based on psychological trauma the defendant suffered after a traumatic event.

Question 4 options:

	Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
	Necessity
	Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
	Battered Women's Syndrome

Question 5 (2.5 points)

__________ refers to the failure of proof defense based on the defendant's inability to form the required criminal intent due to a medical disease or defect.

Question 5 options:

	Insanity
	Diminished capacity
	Excuse
	Justification

Question 6 (2.5 points)

__________ defenses are unrelated to the elements of the crime or the defendant's alleged fault or guilt.

Question 6 options:

	Justification
	Non-exculpatory defenses
	Excuse defenses
	Affirmative defense

Question 7 (2.5 points)

__________ defense results in the acquittal of the defendant.

Question 7 options:

	Self
	Perfect
	Excuse
	Imperfect

Question 8 (2.5 points)

__________ specified the conditions under which deadly force could be used in the apprehension of suspected felons.

Question 8 options:

	Coker v. Georgia
	Tennessee v. Garner
	Roper v. Simmons
	U.S. v. Hibel

Question 9 (2.5 points)

Excuse defenses focus on:

Question 9 options:

	the actor.
	the act.
	offense modifications.
	failure of proof.

Question 10 (2.5 points)

An example of __________ would be if a person drives on a suspended license, a relatively minor crime, to take a sick loved one to the hospital.

Question 10 options:

	justification defense
	affirmative defense
	defense of necessity
	failure of proof defense

Question 11 (2.5 points)

A person is _________ if they cannot be blamed for the intoxicated state.

Question 11 options:

	involuntarily intoxicated
	under duress
	voluntarily intoxicated
	excused

Question 12 (2.5 points)

__________ defense results in the defendant being convicted of a lesser crime.

Question 12 options:

	Self
	Perfect
	Excuse
	Imperfect

Question 13 (2.5 points)

In a justification defense, the defendant accepts responsibility for the act they are charged with, but argues that the act was:

Question 13 options:

	not proved at trial.
	permissible under the circumstances.
	raised at trial.
	essentially an offense modification.

Question 14 (2.5 points)

___________ refers to a group of defenses where the defendant admits what he/she did was wrong but claims he/she should be excused from criminal liability.

Question 14 options:

	Justification
	Non-exculpatory defenses
	Excuse defenses
	Affirmative defense

Question 15 (2.5 points)

The following are all the main reasons for excuse defenses EXCEPT:

Question 15 options:

	deterrence.
	rehabilitation.
	lack of causation.
	moral blameworthiness.

Question 16 (2.5 points)

__________ is a waiver of a juvenile from a juvenile court to adult court in which the waiver to criminal court is presumed appropriate.

Question 16 options:

	Legislative exclusion
	Presumptive waiver
	Discretionary waiver
	Mandatory waiver

Question 17 (2.5 points)

__________ theory refers to underlying justification defenses based on the idea that an innocent person has the moral right to act for his/her own benefit in certain situations.

Question 17 options:

	Perfect defense
	Public benefit
	Moral rights
	Superior interest

Question 18 (2.5 points)

__________ is an excuse defense applicable when the defendant is forced to commit a crime by threat or force.

Question 18 options:

	Necessity
	Excuse
	Duress
	Self-defense

Question 19 (2.5 points)

__________ is generally not a defense to intentional killing.

Question 19 options:

	Necessity
	Excuse
	Duress
	Self-defense

Question 20 (2.5 points)

__________ refers to a defense formally raised by the defendant that requires the production of evidence.

Question 20 options:

	Justification
	Non-exculpatory defenses
	Excuse defenses
	Affirmative defense

Question 21 (2.5 points)

In __________, the Court ruled that the first prong, the credibility prong, may also be satisfied when the informant incriminates themselves in criminal activity, provided that such a statement is against self-interest.

Question 21 options:

	Spinelli v. U.S.
	Illinois v. Gates
	Draper v. U.S.
	Aguilar v. Texas

Question 22 (2.5 points)

In __________, the Court created the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.

Question 22 options:

	Silverthorne Lumber Inc. v. U.S.
	U.S. v. Leon
	Mapp v. Ohio
	Escobedo v. Illinois

Question 23 (2.5 points)

The __________ is an exception to the exclusionary rule which provides that evidence considered inadmissible at one trial can be used in a later trial to impeach the defendant.

Question 23 options:

	silver platter doctrine
	impeachment doctrine
	good faith exception
	plain view doctrine

Question 24 (2.5 points)

The __________ Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects against self-incrimination.

Question 24 options:

	8th
	6th
	4th
	5th

Question 25 (2.5 points)

In __________, the Court admitted evidence because of attenuation.

Question 25 options:

	Rawlings v. Kentucky
	Wong Sun v. U.S.
	Segura v. U.S.
	Dunaway v. New York

Question 26 (2.5 points)

This part of the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement, known as __________, allows officers to search not only the suspect incident to arrest, but also his or her "grabbing area."

Question 26 options:

	armspan rule
	exigent circumstances
	hot pursuit
	the plain view doctrine

Question 27 (2.5 points)

All of the following amendments are important to criminal procedure EXCEPT the:

Question 27 options:

	1st.
	4th.
	6th.
	8th.

Question 28 (2.5 points)

The __________is an exception to the exclusionary rule which provides that when an honest mistake is made during the course of a search or seizure, any subsequently obtained evidence will be considered admissible.

Question 28 options:

	silver platter doctrine
	impeachment doctrine
	good faith exception
	plain view doctrine

Question 29 (2.5 points)

__________ is a method of alternative dispute resolution in which a neutral third party renders disciplinary decisions.

Question 29 options:

	Civilian review
	Civilian input
	Grand jury
	Mediation

Question 30 (2.5 points)

All of the following are important sources of rights EXCEPT:

Question 30 options:

	court decisions.
	law journals.
	statutes.
	the Constitution.

Question 31 (2.5 points)

__________ is the typical remedy for an illegal arrest.

Question 31 options:

	Automatic fee paid by the police department
	Dropping criminal charges
	A release from custody
	Public apology

Question 32 (2.5 points)

The use of physical brutality to coerce a confession violates the ______ Amendment.

Question 32 options:

	5th
	6th
	8th
	14th

Question 33 (2.5 points)

The level of suspicion that is less than probable cause but more than a hunch is __________ suspicion.

Question 33 options:

	true
	absolute
	necessary
	reasonable

Question 34 (2.5 points)

Probable cause is always required in all of the following scenarios EXCEPT:

Question 34 options:

	private property arrests.
	arrests of foreign nationals.
	emergency circumstances.
	arrests of juveniles.

Question 35 (2.5 points)

American criminal _______ consists of a vast set of rules and guidelines that describe how suspected and accused criminals are to be handled and processed by the justice system.

Question 35 options:

	evidence
	law
	procedure
	justice

Question 36 (2.5 points)

The reasonable man concept applies to:

Question 36 options:

	proof.
	evidence.
	guilt.
	probable cause.

Question 37 (2.5 points)

In __________, the Court abandoned the two-prong probable cause analysis and replaced it with the totality of the circumstances test.

Question 37 options:

	Spinelli v. U.S.
	Illinois v. Gates
	Draper v. U.S.
	Aguilar v. Texas

Question 38 (2.5 points)

__________ carved out an automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement.

Question 38 options:

	California v. Carney
	Carroll v. United States
	Arkansas v. Sanders
	Robbins v. California

Question 39 (2.5 points)

__________ declared that a state attorney general cannot issue a search warrant.

Question 39 options:

	Carroll v. United States
	Payton v. New York
	Coolidge v. New Hampshire
	United States v. United States District Court

Question 40 (2.5 points)

Regarding search warrants, _________ refers to where the police can look for evidence.

Question 40 options:

	scope
	manner
	search incident
	knock and announce