Question 2 Fred agreed to purchase two Panasonic refrigerators from Maxim Superstore for RM3,200 each, which he believed to be a good price. According to their contract of sale, the title to the refrigerators would transfer to Fred upon full payment. Fred paid RM3,200 to Maxim Superstore, who then delivered the refrigerators to him. Subsequently, Fred advertised both refrigerators for sale at a discounted price on his Facebook. Rajani, upon seeing the advertisement, purchased both refrigerators through Facebook. Fred delivered the refrigerators to Rajani the following day. However, Maxim Superstore discovered that Fred had not completed the full payment for the refrigerators and requested Rajani to return them. Rajani, who was unaware that Fred had not completed the payment, seeks your advice on the nemo dat quod non habet rule and whether she should return the refrigerators to Maxim Superstore based on SOGA 1957. [10 marks] Required: Your answer shall include introduction and conclusion. Your answer shall not exceed three (3) pages