QUESTION $2$

In a San Jose court case, lawyer Amanda Hawes wnated to use IBM's $30-$year corporate mortality file to be used against the tech giant. Did the judge allow it$?$ Why or why not?

Yes. The file was ruled relevant because the workers were still alive.

No$.$ The file was ruled not relevant because the workers were deceased.

Yes $-$ under the Freedom of Information Act.

No$.$ The file was ruled not relevant, because the former workers suing were still alive. Also, allowing the jury to see the results would prejudice them.