question 2 This question is actually to see if the auditors notes make sense or not. The full notes are within question 1.. no additional comments are needed.

AutoSave (C on) Document1 - Saved to this PC - Search Eric Macis EM X File Home Insert Design Layout References Mailings Review View Help Foxit PDF Share Comments AutoTire Inc. is your Client: Monetary Unit Sampling You have been charged with reviewing a staff auditor's MUS and related procedures on the audit of SEC public registrant Auto Tire Incorporated of 12/31/2020. The staff auditor, Ima W. Rong, claims to have followed monetary unit sampling and performed accompanying audit procedures plan as documented below. The staff auditor's work appears - below - in a numbered list to facilitate your review and our evaluation of your review. Following the staff auditor's work (attached), you will find a table that includes a new row for numbered item completed by the staff auditor. For each rowumbered item, you must indicate either: "okay, leave the notes as is"; OR Both describe and implement, to the extent practicable, any corrections needed. That is, based on your review notes, we will be able to understand both where you think the staff auditor performed poorly and what you believe would correct the staff auditor's shortcomings (so far as you can tell from the work paper documentation provided). When providing corrections, you should show and explain your work. Question 2) I set the tolerable misstatement rates as follows: Account Asserted Balance Tolerable Tolerable Overstatement Understatement Accounts Receivable $2,400,000 59% Accounts Payable $3,000,000 3% Total $5,400,000 na na is this okay or if not describe and implement, to the extent practicable, any corrections needed Page 1 of 1 226 words CQ Focus - - + 10013 Type here to search T 9W S P D P Desktop 6:39 PM 12/16/2020