Question 21 21. Can the promise of a gift to be given to the recipient next month be enforced by a court if or when the person making the promise subsequently changes her mind and decides not to give the gift? O Yes O No, unless the promise to give the gift is in writing and is signed by the giver O Yes, but only if the gift is worth more than $1,000 O Yes, but only if the promise to give the gift was made to a family member O NoQuestion 22 0.5 pts 22. Assume the following facts: While pedestrians Carol and Boris are crossing the street, they are struck and killed by a taxi driven by Alice. Alice is an employee of ABC Taxi Company ("ABC") and, at the time of the accident, Alice was working for and driving a taxi owned by ABC. Boris and Carol's families are suing Alice and ABC for negligence and for wrongful death. These events occurred in a contributory negligence state. Who has likely liability on these facts? O Both ABC and Alice, provided that Carol and Boris are found not to be at fault in any way O Just ABC, provided that Carol and Boris are found not to be at fault in any way O No one O ABC and Alice, provided that Carol and Boris are found to be less than 50% at fault O Just Alice, provided that Carol and Boris are found not to be at fault in any wayQuestion 23 0.5 pts 23. Assume the same facts as set forth in Question 22, as well as these additional facts: Carol and Boris jointly own 23 Elm Street. After being struck by the taxi driven by Alice, Carol dies instantly, but Boris dies after a week in the hospital. After Boris's death, who now owns 23 Elm Street? (NOTE: An "heir" is a person legally entitled to the property of another on that person's death.) [The facts from Question 22 are as follows: While pedestrians Carol and Boris are crossing the street, they are struck and killed by a taxi driven by Alice. Alice is an employee of ABC Taxi Company ("ABC") and, at the time of the accident, Alice was working for and driving a taxi owned by ABC. Boris and Carol's families are suing Alice and ABC for negligence and for wrongful death. These events occurred in a contributory negligence state. ] O Boris's heirs, provided that Carol and Boris held 23 Elm Street as joint tenants O Carol's heirs, provided that Carol and Boris held 23 Elm Street as joint tenants O Carol's heirs, provided that Carol and Boris held 23 Elm Street as tenants in common O one-half (34) of 23 Elm Street is owned by Boris's heirs, and one-half (34) of 23 Elm Street is owned by Carol's heirs, regardless of how Carol and Boris held 23 Elm Street O Boris's heirs, provided that Carol and Boris held 23 Elm Street as tenants in commonQuestion 24 24. In which of the following breach-of-contract hypotheticals will a court be most likely to award the injured party something other than monetary damages? O When a farmer backs out of a valid sales contract in which he agreed to sell 100 bushels of blackberries to a fruit retailer O When a baker backs out of a valid sales contract in which she agreed to sell 100 loaves of bread to a caterer O When a property owner backs out of a valid sales contract in which she agreed to sell 100 acres of lakefront property to a property development company O When a textile company backs out of a valid sales contract in which it agreed to sell 100 bolts of dark blue cloth to a clothing manufacturer O When a railroad company backs out of a valid services contract in which it agreed to transport 100 tons of coal to an electricity generating power plant