Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Question 22 4 pts Maria is the Chief Financial Officer of a company being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission for various alleged violations
Question 22 4 pts Maria is the Chief Financial Officer of a company being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission for various alleged violations of federal law. Each of the following would constitute an obstruction of justice except: Refusing to anwers questions, invoking the Fifth Amendment Ordering her secretary to lie if questioned Falsifying some figures on the company's financial records before handing them over to investigators. Shredding her personal calendar and appointment book after the investigators demand them O All would be obstruction of justice Question 21 4 pts Officer Jerry stops Bridget on the street because he thinks her haircut is unattractive. During a pat-down search, he finds marijuana in her pocket. He then uses the discovery of the marijuana to get a warrant to search her home for drugs. The search uncovers eight kilos of cocaine. If she challenges the admissibility of both drugs, how should the court rule? Both the marijuana and the cocaine would be admissible because they are serious drug charges. If the marijuana possession is a misdemeanor in that state, that evidence would be inadmissible. Neither the marijuana nor the cocaine would be admissible at trial. The marijuana would be admissible at trial, but the more serious charge of cocaine possession would be dismissed. The marijuana would be excluded because he did not have probable cause to stop and search her, but the cocaine is admissible because of the warranti D Question 23 4 pts Which one of the following statements about double jeopardy is true? O A person can be prosecuted under both federal and state law for the same actions only if the federal and state laws have all the same elements. The concept is found in the Fifth Amendment A person acquitted of a crime cannot be sued civilly for the same events that formed the basis for the criminal prosecution The prohibition against being tried for the same crime twice applies only against the federal government, not state governments All of these statements are true. 4 pts Xavier and Yolanda were having an extramarital affair. One night after a few drinks at the local bar in Salisbury, MD, Yolanda, laughing, said how much happier she would be if her husband, Zoltan, were dead. Xavier, also laughing, said it wouldn't be hard to kill him. At this point, the two stopped laughing, and hatched a plan. Xavier would buy the gun, Yolanda would lure Zoltan to a deserted wooded area, and Xavier would be waiting to shoot Zoltan. They decided exactly how, when, and where this would happen, and how they would dispose of the body. and Yolanda pulled up a Google Earth map of the wooded area on her iPhone, and prices for guns at GunsRUs.com. Unbeknownst to them, the bartender, who was a friend of Zoltan's, overheard the plan, and immediately called Zoltan. Zoltan rushed to the bar and confronted Xavier and Yolanda, who confessed their intentions to him. Which of the following crimes have Yolanda and Xavier committed? O Manslaughter Burglary Conspiracy Obstruction of Justice None of these Question 22 4 pts Maria is the Chief Financial Officer of a company being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission for various alleged violations of federal law. Each of the following would constitute an obstruction of justice except: Refusing to anwers questions, invoking the Fifth Amendment Ordering her secretary to lie if questioned Falsifying some figures on the company's financial records before handing them over to investigators. Shredding her personal calendar and appointment book after the investigators demand them O All would be obstruction of justice Question 21 4 pts Officer Jerry stops Bridget on the street because he thinks her haircut is unattractive. During a pat-down search, he finds marijuana in her pocket. He then uses the discovery of the marijuana to get a warrant to search her home for drugs. The search uncovers eight kilos of cocaine. If she challenges the admissibility of both drugs, how should the court rule? Both the marijuana and the cocaine would be admissible because they are serious drug charges. If the marijuana possession is a misdemeanor in that state, that evidence would be inadmissible. Neither the marijuana nor the cocaine would be admissible at trial. The marijuana would be admissible at trial, but the more serious charge of cocaine possession would be dismissed. The marijuana would be excluded because he did not have probable cause to stop and search her, but the cocaine is admissible because of the warranti D Question 23 4 pts Which one of the following statements about double jeopardy is true? O A person can be prosecuted under both federal and state law for the same actions only if the federal and state laws have all the same elements. The concept is found in the Fifth Amendment A person acquitted of a crime cannot be sued civilly for the same events that formed the basis for the criminal prosecution The prohibition against being tried for the same crime twice applies only against the federal government, not state governments All of these statements are true. 4 pts Xavier and Yolanda were having an extramarital affair. One night after a few drinks at the local bar in Salisbury, MD, Yolanda, laughing, said how much happier she would be if her husband, Zoltan, were dead. Xavier, also laughing, said it wouldn't be hard to kill him. At this point, the two stopped laughing, and hatched a plan. Xavier would buy the gun, Yolanda would lure Zoltan to a deserted wooded area, and Xavier would be waiting to shoot Zoltan. They decided exactly how, when, and where this would happen, and how they would dispose of the body. and Yolanda pulled up a Google Earth map of the wooded area on her iPhone, and prices for guns at GunsRUs.com. Unbeknownst to them, the bartender, who was a friend of Zoltan's, overheard the plan, and immediately called Zoltan. Zoltan rushed to the bar and confronted Xavier and Yolanda, who confessed their intentions to him. Which of the following crimes have Yolanda and Xavier committed? O Manslaughter Burglary Conspiracy Obstruction of Justice None of these
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started