Question 3 2 pts Would an email written after the execution of a contract and which contained additional terms different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule? No, because it explains the agreement Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement and is therefore not subject to the parol evidence rule No, because it changes the agreement and WHEN it is written does NOT matter under the parol evidence rule No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract and WHEN it is written does NOT matter under the parol evidence rule

Would an email written after the execution of a contract and which contained additional terms different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule? No, because it explains the agreement Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement and is therefore not subject to the parol evidence rule No, because it changes the agreement and WHEN it is written does NOT matter under the parol evidence rule No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract and WHEN it is written does NOT matter under the parol evidence rule