Question 3 In De Jesus, the employee was a production supervisor with 19.5 years of service. The employer terminated his employment after a production line defect caused a large amount of product to be wasted. Throughout the employer's investigation of the incident, the employee maintained that he had conducted regular checks and that the defect could not have happened on his shift. This was contrary to the evidence of other employees who stated that the employee knew of the defect and did nothing to address it. The employee brought a claim for wrongful dismissal. The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the employer. Do you agree or disagree with the decision? Explain your answer.