Question 3 nd Seller were both citizens of State X, where they attended State University. Just before duated , Buyer purchased Seller s car for $2,500 . At the time , Seller told Buyer that the "in good working order" and that it was a "safe, reliable little car." Seller knew, howev- 1 local mechanic s inspection of the car had revealed that its brakes were so worn that they a signicant safety hazard and required immediate replacement .Instcad of informing f the danger , Seller showed Buyer the mechanic s bill and told him that the car "has just :cked out ." 'aduation, Buyer decided to move permanently to Big City in State Y. Buyer decided to car he bought from Seller for the move . He believed that in a few round -trips he could all of his belongings to his new apartment in Big City. On his way back to his State X t after his rst trip to his new apartment in Big City , Buyer was seriously injured in a accident on a highway in State X. Friend , a citizen of State X and a passenger in Buyer 5 the only witness to the accident . He and Buyer will testify that the accident happened e brakes failed as Buyer attempted to negotiate a curve in the highway . :eks of hospitalization in State X, Buyer settled permanently in his apartment in Big City Y. Having discovered Seller 5 deceit, Buyer sued Seller in the U.S. District Court for the of State X, seeking to recover $500,000 under State X tort law for his injuries and lost In addition , Buyer claimed Seller 5 misrepresentations constituted a breach of warranty tate X contract law and sought recovery ofthe $2,500 paid for the car. 9k after the suit was led , Seller also decided to relocate from State X to Big City , taking are and assuming State Y citizenship as led a motion to dismiss Buyer 5 two claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as also moved for a change of venue to the U.S. District Court for the District of State Y. Should the court dismiss Buyer 5 tort claim , Buyer 5 contract claim , or both for lack of subject matter jurisdiction ? Explain . How should the court rule on Seller 5 motion for a change of venue '2' Explain