.Question 32 v > ' [Z 9 pts 0 1 8 99 (D Details The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 10%. Awarden suspects that this percent is lower if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 357 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 29 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer v b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: ? v Select an answer v [:] (please enter a decimal) H1: ? v Select an answer v C] (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? v = [:] (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) . The p-value = C] (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) . The p-value is ? v a . Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. . Thus, the final conclusion is that un-nmn. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 10% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 10%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 10% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 10%. O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 10% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 10%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. 0 If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 10% and if another 357 inner city residents are surveyed then there would be a 11.86% chance that fewer than 8% of the 357 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders. 0 If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 8% and if another 357 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 11.86% chance of concluding that fewer than 10% of convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. 0 There is a 11.86% chance that fewer than 10% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. Q There is a 10% chance of a Type I error. i. Interpret the level of significance in'the context of the study. 0 If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 10% and if another 357 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 10%. 0 There is a 5% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world. 0 There is a 5% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 10%. 0 If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 10% and if another 357 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 10%. Hint: Help 2? Helpful Videos: Calculations L\" [+] Setup @ [+] Interpretations @ [+] Submit