Question 4 1 day ago Consider an economy that produces tea and rice. Each requires a different type of land, so the at. low-lying flood land used for rice is a factor specic to rice and the hilly land used for tea is specific to tea. However. labor can move freely between the two sectors. so that the wage paid to labor in both sectors is the same. Suppose the marginal product of labor in the tea sector is given by 120# LT. where LT is the number of workers In the tea sector. and the marginal product of labor in the rice sector is given by 120s LR . where LR is the number of workers in the rice sector. Suppose that there are 120 workers. 100 rice farmers. and 100 tea growers in the economy. Assume that the economy is a net importer of rice. a. If the world price of tea and the world price of rice are both $1 per unit. and if the country has a free~trade policy so that the domestic price of each good is equal to the world price, nd the equilib- rium allocation of labor to each sector, the quantity of each good produced in this economy. and the wage. b. Now. suppose the government imposes a100% ad valorem tariff on rice imports. doubling its domestic price to $2. Re- peat the analysis of part (a). c. Derive budget lines for workers. rioe farmers. and tea growers. before and after the tariff. Disregarding tariff rev- enue. who benefits from the tariff? Who is hurt? Is there any group for which you cannot tell? d. Suppose we added one more piece of information: All consumers in this econ- omy have Leontieff preferences. so that they always consume 4 units of rice for every unit of tea that they drink. Does that change your answer to (c)? Question 5 1 day ago In the model of question 4, suppose that in- stead of an import tariff. the government had imposed a 50% tax on exports of tea. Repeat the analysis. How do the outcomes compare with the case of the tariff\