Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Question 4: Sedberry, Inc. by written contract, employed Akers as Chief Engineer for five year term. Mrs. M.B. Sedberry guaranteed the employer's performance of this

image text in transcribed
Question 4: Sedberry, Inc. by written contract, employed Akers as Chief Engineer for five year term. Mrs. M.B. Sedberry guaranteed the employer's performance of this contract. Sedberry Inc, employed Whitsitt as Assistant Chief Engineer for five years. He guaranteed employer's performance again. Difficulty arose, financial and person at the site in TX and the two returned to Franklin to discuss the company with Mrs. Franklin. At the very beginning to show their good faith, Akers told Mrs. Sedberry they would offer their resignation on a ninety day notice. provided they were paid according to the contract for that period. She would not accept them. She held that no mention was made of the ninety day notice. She later sent them telegrams: "resignation offer accepted, effective immediately." Akers then wrote that there was no pending offer to resign. The offer he expressed earlier was rejected. His letter further stated that Akers was expecting to be paid according to the terms of his contract until he could find other employment that would pay him as much income as that provided in his contract, and that if he accepted a job with less income, he expected the difference. Does ignoring an offer constitute non-acceptance? Discuss. (10) Question 4: Sedberry, Inc. by written contract, employed Akers as Chief Engineer for five year term. Mrs. M.B. Sedberry guaranteed the employer's performance of this contract. Sedberry Inc, employed Whitsitt as Assistant Chief Engineer for five years. He guaranteed employer's performance again. Difficulty arose, financial and person at the site in TX and the two returned to Franklin to discuss the company with Mrs. Franklin. At the very beginning to show their good faith, Akers told Mrs. Sedberry they would offer their resignation on a ninety day notice. provided they were paid according to the contract for that period. She would not accept them. She held that no mention was made of the ninety day notice. She later sent them telegrams: "resignation offer accepted, effective immediately." Akers then wrote that there was no pending offer to resign. The offer he expressed earlier was rejected. His letter further stated that Akers was expecting to be paid according to the terms of his contract until he could find other employment that would pay him as much income as that provided in his contract, and that if he accepted a job with less income, he expected the difference. Does ignoring an offer constitute non-acceptance? Discuss

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Handbook Of Experimental Finance

Authors: Sascha Füllbrunn, Ernan Haruvy

1st Edition

1800372329, 978-1800372320

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

explain how organisations compete through responsiveness.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Apply your own composing style to personalize your messages.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Format memos and e-mail properly.

Answered: 1 week ago