Question 41 0.5 pts 41. Immanuel Kant -- O was a proponent of utilitarianism O was a devout believer in ethical rules derived from Christianity O believed in universal ethical truths O teaches business ethics courses at Foothill College O was a moral relativistQuestion 42 0.5 42. Which of the following contracts does not need to be in writing to be enforceable? An agreement -- O between a mother and her son's long-term girlfriend that, if the girlfriend marries the son, the mother will give the girlfriend $5,000 O between an employer and an employee that the employee will work for the employer for $5,000 per month and for not less than 10 months O between a landlord and a tenant in which the landlord rents to the tenant an apartment at 5000 Elm Street for $5,000 per month O between a father and a car dealership at which the father's daughter is buying a $5,000 used car and borrowing money from the car dealership to finance the purchase, and the father agrees with the car dealership that if his daughter does not repay the loan, the father will do so O between two merchants involving the sale of goods for $5,000Question 43 0.5 pts 43. 16-year-old teenagers Krisha and Raj are visiting the city zoo. Krisha teases Samar, a Bengal tiger at the zoo. Raj does not. Samar becomes agitated as a result of Krisha's teasing. Samar suddenly leaps over the tiger enclosure separating the tiger from the teenagers, and kills both Krisha and Raj. If the zoo is sued by Krisha's and Raj's families on these facts, what will be the likely outcome? O The zoo will be liable for Krisha's and Raj's deaths because of res ipsa loquitur O The zoo will be liable for Krisha's and Raj's deaths because Krisha and Raj were not adults and the zoo has a duty to protect minors O The zoo will not liable for either Krisha's or Raj's deaths because Krisha and Raj assumed the risk of a tiger attack by visiting the zoo O The zoo will be liable for only Raj's death because Krisha will likely be found to be at fault for teasing Samar O The zoo will be liable for Krisha's and Raj's deaths because of strict liabilityQuestion 44 44. Which of the following statements about intellectual property rights (IP rights) is true? O For a patent to be valid, the patent must be granted by the government; copyrights and trademarks do not need to be granted by the government to be valid O There is no difference between copyright, patent and trademark O For a trademark to be valid, the trademark must be granted by the government; copyrights and patents do not need to be granted by the government to be valid O For a copyright to be valid, the copyright must be granted by the government; patents and trademarks do not need to be granted by the government to be valid O All IP rights (copyrights, patents and trademarks) must be granted by the government to be valid