Question 5 Next Previous Which one of the following is NOT an attractive way to reduce the design, assembly, marketing, and other costs per action-capture camera sold in an effort to achieve a sizable low-cost competitive advantage over rivails? O Paying PAT members an attractive assembly quality incentive to help reduce warranty claims on cameras sold and also boost PAT productivity o Striving to keeping marketing costs per action camera sold in all 4 geographic regions to levels that are several dollars below the industry-average benchmark (as reported on p. 6 of the Camera & Drone Journal) Tying different combinations of components, product enhancements, and extra performance features to be used in action cameras in order to discover the lowest cost combination for achieving a competitively appealing P/Q rating D Spending aggressively (but also taking care not to overspend) on camera product R&D o Keeping a watchful eye on the warranty period offered by other companies and pursuing ow the industry-average and, more ideally, p the company's warranty peri od belovw close to the industry-low benchmark (as reported on p. 6 of the Camera & Drone Journal) Copying, redistributing, or website posting is expressly prohibited and constitutes copyright violation. Copyright 2018 by Gio-Bus Sotware, Inc.