Question 5 Using your Legal Links, find and read Zheng v. Your New Car Calgary Inc., 2015 ABQB 121. According Not yet to the decision: answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. The Defendants acknowledged that the Defendant, Your New Car Calgary Inc., owed money to the Flag Plaintiff but did not acknowledge that the Defendant, Mr. Wittenberg was personally liable for the debt. question O b. The Court held that the Defendant, Mr. Wittenberg formed or used the Defendant, Your New Car Calgary Inc., for the purpose of doing an unlawful or wrongful act or created it to deflect monies from their proper use. O c. The Court agreed with the Plaintiff that it was appropriate to lift the corporate veil in this case. O d. The Plaintiff in the action was WRZ Inc., an incorporated entity.Question 6 According to the decision in Zheng v. Your New Car Calgary Inc.: Not yet answered Select one: Marked out of a. The case of Bhasin v. Hrynew does not deal with the duty of good faith in contractual dealings. 1.00 Flag b. Only the Defendants relied on case law in support of their arguments. question O c. The cases of Spartek Systems Inc. v. Brown and Tirecraft Group Inc. v. High Park Holdings ULC provide some guidelines for courts when considering circumstances where it may be appropriate to lift the corporate veil. O d. The Defendants referred to the case of Bhasin v. Hrynew in support of their arguments. Question 7 Using the appropriate legal link, locate and read the decision of the Provincial Court of Alberta in Not yet Durham v. Bennett, 2009 ABPC 66. Which of the following statements regarding the Durham v. answered Bennett case is TRUE? Marked out of 1.0 Select one: \\ Flag O a. The Plaintiffs brought an action in trespass against the Defendants and the Defendants question counterclaimed in nuisance. O b. The Court awarded the Plaintiffs the sum of $20,000 in damages. O c. The Plaintiffs' failed to establish their claim in trespass against the Defendants. O d. The Defendants established their counterclaim in nuisance against the Plaintiffs. Question 8 Which of the following statements regarding the Durham v. Bennett case is TRUE? Not yet answered Select one: Marked out of a. No experts testified at the trial of this matter. 1.00 Flag O b. The Plaintiffs and Defendants owned adjoining properties on Wentworth Way in St. Albert, Alberta. question O c. The parties were represented by lawyers at trial. O d. The Judge referred to case authority in her Judgment.Question 9 You are considering suing someone for defamation in the Court of Queen's Bench in Edmonton. Not yet Before consulting with a lawyer about your potential action, you conduct some research about answered defamation legislation in Alberta. Based on your research, you confirm that: Marked out of 1.00 Select one: Flag O a. The applicable legislation is the Canadian Defamation Act. Section 2 states: "This Act and question associated regulations apply to the adjudication of defamation actions in the superior courts of all provinces in Canada, except Quebec." O b. Alberta's defamation legislation was repealed in 2015. O c. The Alberta legislation is the Defamation Act and above the "Definitions" heading, the following statement appears: "HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, enacts as follows" O d. There is no defamation legislation in Alberta. Question 10 In front of a group of people at a jewelry store, a security guard pointed at a couple and called them Not yet "thieves". He said they had stolen an expensive ring from the store because "stealing is part of their answered culture." Since the couple had in fact brought the ring into the store for repairs, not stolen it, they Marked out of called the police. One of the other customers in the store who overheard the guard was their 1.00 neighbour. The police arrived on scene and confirmed the couple owned the ring. Should the couple Flag sue the security guard and the jewelry store for damages in tort, what tort is made out on these facts? question Select one: O a. Fraudulent misrepresentation O b. Malicious prosecution O c. Conspiracy O d. Defamation
