Question 7 Assume a company is evaluating three different investments, Investment A has an NPV of $0.00. Investment B has a positive NPV of $2,000. Investment has a negative NPV of ($1.000). Which of the following statements is most true? A and B are worth investing in (though they should be carefully compared to each other and evaluated further but should be avoided by the company, since it does not eam the minimum cost of capital All three investments are worth investing in by the company (though they should be carefully compared to each other and evaluated further), since all three at least made the minimum cost of capital Only A should be invested in because it's IRR - the cost of capital o Only B is worthy of the company's investment money, since the others fail to earn the minimum cost of capital 4 pts