Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Question 9 1 pts You need to assume many things in this question. The purpose of this question and the next is to demonstrate the
Question 9 1 pts You need to assume many things in this question. The purpose of this question and the next is to demonstrate the effect of the tax exemption of interest incomes from municipal bonds on the borrowing costs of city governments. 1. Assume that contrary to reality) currently the municipal bonds (those issued and sold by city governments) are taxable. 2. Assume that the interest rate on one-year Treasury discount bond is 20 percent (a bit too high, if you ask me. But this is a hypothetical world). 3. Assume that the average income tax rate faced by bond holders is 25 percent (again, the real world is much more complicated. But, whatever.) 4. Assume the Treasury wants to borrow $120,000,000 to finance some government expenditures. It wants to do this by issuing a one-year discount bond. This bond is, of course, risk-free. 5. Assume that, coincidently, a city government also wants to borrow $120,000,000 to fix some street potholes by issuing a one-year discount bond. Assume this bond is also risk-free. 6. Finally assume that the market for this municipal bond is too small relative to the market for the Treasury bond. So the actions by this city government will have no effect on the interest rates on Treasury bonds. Under these assumptions, to be able to borrow $120,000,000, the Treasury has to issue a bond with a face value of dollars and the city government has to issue a bond with a face value of dollars. The after-tax rate of return from the Treasury bond for the investors like you and me will be percent and the after-tax rate of return from the municipal bond will be percent. After one year when the bonds mature, the Treasury will pay dollars in interest to the lenders. The city government will pay dollars in interest to the lenders. Question 9 1 pts You need to assume many things in this question. The purpose of this question and the next is to demonstrate the effect of the tax exemption of interest incomes from municipal bonds on the borrowing costs of city governments. 1. Assume that contrary to reality) currently the municipal bonds (those issued and sold by city governments) are taxable. 2. Assume that the interest rate on one-year Treasury discount bond is 20 percent (a bit too high, if you ask me. But this is a hypothetical world). 3. Assume that the average income tax rate faced by bond holders is 25 percent (again, the real world is much more complicated. But, whatever.) 4. Assume the Treasury wants to borrow $120,000,000 to finance some government expenditures. It wants to do this by issuing a one-year discount bond. This bond is, of course, risk-free. 5. Assume that, coincidently, a city government also wants to borrow $120,000,000 to fix some street potholes by issuing a one-year discount bond. Assume this bond is also risk-free. 6. Finally assume that the market for this municipal bond is too small relative to the market for the Treasury bond. So the actions by this city government will have no effect on the interest rates on Treasury bonds. Under these assumptions, to be able to borrow $120,000,000, the Treasury has to issue a bond with a face value of dollars and the city government has to issue a bond with a face value of dollars. The after-tax rate of return from the Treasury bond for the investors like you and me will be percent and the after-tax rate of return from the municipal bond will be percent. After one year when the bonds mature, the Treasury will pay dollars in interest to the lenders. The city government will pay dollars in interest to the lenders
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started