Question 9 Find the Supreme Court of Canada case of Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16, and identify Not yet which of the following statements is FALSE? answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. H (Heller) started a class proceeding against Uber for violations of employment standards legislation. Flag O b. Uber brought a motion to stay the class proceedings in favour of arbitration in the Netherlands. question O c. The case originated in Ontario. O d. H argued that Uber's mediation clause was unconscionable and therefor invalid.Question 10 Now that you have found the Supreme Court of Canada case of Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 Not yet SCC 16, which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the background of this case? answered Marked out of Select one: 1.00 O a. Mr Heller earned approximately $20,800-$31,200 per year driving for Uber, before taxes and expenses. Flag O b. The services agreement between Uber and the driver contains a mandatory mediation clause. question O c. The choice of law clause in the services agreement requires the agreement to be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Netherlands, including its rules on conflicts of laws. O d. Uber operates a business solely in North America