question a

The court with original jurisdiction is the Maryland Civil District Court, which was drafted by Maryland and sent to the tenant, as well as a contract between Barry and Caren, and agreed to under the laws of Maryland and Baltimore.

question B

The Civil District Tribunal in Baltimore MD, as opposed to the Circuit Court, would be the most likely venue for this case.

question C

The court would be personally competent in this matter, as in the case of Baltimore, and the Court therefore has jurisdiction to judge any matters within its jurisdiction concerning any person or enterprise doing business within or with connections to the state. You even have the power to try case when you have it.

question D

For this case a jury would not be required, because it is civil proceedings, just an infringement of the contract. One that can be solved when the claimant is awarded for the damages, can withdraw from the contract or may even return to the beginning before an agreement between the two parties has ever been reached.

question E

No, my reply would not have changed because the company of Barry did not breach the agreement, but it was a construction firm in Caren, who only achieved partial performance, as we understand in contract law that part performance is a breach of the agreement since the full conditions that were agreed were not fulfilled by one party.