Question below. Thank you

38 Kamal's aunt promises in writing to pay him $5,000 if he does not drink coffee for one year. Kamal drinks no coffee for one year; however, his aunt now refuses to pay him as agreed. The aunt claims that because Kamal sullered no detriment by refraining from collee, his nondrinking does not constitute legal consideration; therefore, no contract was formed. What will be the outcome if Kamal sues his aunt under this contract? Kamal will lose because retraining from an action can never be consideration. Karnal will win because this agreement did not require any consideration. Kamal will win because he had a right to drink coffee, which he gave up in exchange for the promise of $5,000. @ Kamal will love because consideration has to have a monetary value