Question content area top

Part 1

In the aftermath of Hurricane Thelma, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is considering two alternative approaches to protect a freshwater wetland from the encroaching seawater during high tides. The first alternative, the construction of a 5-mile long, 20-foot-high levee, would have an investment cost of

$27,000,000

with annual upkeep costs estimated at

$700,000.

A new roadway along the top of the levee would provide two major benefits: (1) improved recreational access for fishermen and (2) reduction of the driving distance between the towns at opposite ends of the proposed levee by 11 miles. The annual benefit for the levee has been estimated at

$1,300,000.

The second alternative, a channel-dredging operation, would have an investment cost of

$13,000,000.

The annual cost of maintaining the channel is estimated at

$400,000.

There are no documented benefits for the channel-dredging project. Using a MARR of

8%

and assuming a

24-year

life for either alternative, apply the incremental B-C ratio

(B/C)

method to determine which alternative should be chosen. (Note: The null alternative, Do nothing, is not a viable alternative.)

LOADING...

Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is

8%

per year.

Question content area bottom

Part 1

The incremental B-C ratio is

enter your response here,

thus

the levee construction

the cheenel deadgining opration

the levee construction

the channel-dredging operation

alternative should be chosen. (Round to two decimal places.)