QUESTION I A. Boba, who was unemployed, registered with the Slow Employment Agency. A contract was then made under which Boba, in consideration of such position as the agency would obtain for her, agreed to pay the agency one half of her first month's salary. The contract also contained an assignment by Boba to the agency of one half of her first month's salary. Two weeks later, the agency obtained a permanent position for Boba with the Alkret Co. at a monthly salary of $1, 900. The agency also notified Alkret Co. of the assignment by Boba. At the end of the first month, Alkret Co. paid Boba her salary in full. Boba then quit and disappeared. The agency now sues Alkret Co. for $950 under the assignment. Who will prevail and why? Please be specific! B. On November 20th, Boba offered to sell to Cyndi her Pontiac automobile for $6,000. Cindy, who is currently employed as a mid-level manager at "Best Shoes Ever," informed Boba that she wanted the car, and she would pay for it by assigning to Boba her next paycheck (due on 12/1). Boba said "yay," and they signed a valid written contract on 11/21. The contract clearly specified the date for delivery (12/2), and a method of payment (the assignment related to Cindy's 12/1 paycheck). Subsequently, Cindy had a coffee with her best friend, Monica, and Monica told her that Pontiacs break down easily and she should not buy a Pontiac. Cindy said, "but what about the contract I signed?" Monica said, "don't worry about that, assignments of rights like the one in your contract are not legally enforceable, don't you remember Prof. Tokic's BLAW class? Helllooo? Cindy?" Is Monica right? Please discuss the relevant law