question

I need one good response for my paper of what I did correctly

Executive 1's philosophy is right for most people. Without careful planning and implementation of a step-by-step process, many people would not have had the success they enjoy today. Executive 2's philosophy is clearly wrong for the vast majority of people. As an example, becoming an orthopedic surgeon in American is a 12-year path, at a minimum. One has to graduate from college with a high GPA, get accepted into a good medical school (there are bad ones), survive medical school, and get accepted into an orthopedic surgery residency. One must be reasonably intelligent, possess the ability to endure sleep deprivation, and have a disciplined study schedule. Slight deviation at any step along the way can result in dropping out of college, dropping out of medical school, not matching into orthopedic surgery residency (and being forced to become a general surgeon or internal medicine doctor), or getting kicked out of orthopedic surgery residency. No amount of luck will allow one to become an orthopedic surgeon without following a strict and rigorous plan. The philosophy of executive 2 will be successful for some lucky people. However, putting this much faith in luck is better suited for the craps tables in Las Vegas than with a career than potentially spans four decades. Being flexible and spontaneous, in general, are not bad things. However, they should not be relied on as the core of a career plan. Indeed, according to the textbook, the philosophy of executive 1 (careful planning) will result in increased flexibility that is so cherished by executive 2. Additionally, following the philosophy of executive 1 will help to avoid the complacency trap, described as being carried along by the flow of events (which is the essence of executive 2's plan). I strongly favor the position of executive 1. The luck factor that allowed executive 2 to be happy is something that I would welcome; however, I would not rely on it for success. A blend of the two perspectives may be a good thing. However, as pointed out earlier, a benefit of proper planning is that flexibility becomes greater. If one is financially secure and just working for something to do, then there is absolutely nothing wrong with thinking like executive 2.