Question: In March, Tasha gnfgrs.inie a contract with Kevin to purchase 4 ounces of gold for $9000, with delivery the next month. Tasha also sends Kevin $500 as a deposit. In late March, the price of gold skyrockets. 4 ounces are now worth $20,000, and in April, Kevin refuses to give Tasha her gold. How much in expectation damages can Tasha expect to collect if she takes this to court? You may use Chat GPT to input the above question. If you intend you use Chat GPT, in a word document, include your question to Chat GPT and the response provided. Then analyze the response provided by Chat GPT and the information covered in this class. Discuss what parts of the Chat GPT response are good, and which parts need to be revised, then make any revisions required to the response and provide your final response to the question for grading. You may also decide to not use Chat GPT. In this case please just submit your analysis of the question. You do not have to include the output. Please address that Chat GPT was not used in your introduction to confirm. Your analysis and if applicable, correction of the Chat GPT response are what will be graded. Submissions should include student name and number, course name and number, and instructor name. Please do not use a title page. Submissions should be approximately 1-4 pages 1.5 spaced at 12 pt font using Ariel or Times New Roman and with Linch margins, and no longer than 4 pages 1.5 spaced (one page will likely be take up with the Chat GPT question and answer). Rubric: Followed 0 not all parts 1 All parts of Instructions: included, missing at the assignment All requirements (vour question, Chat least one part (e.g. your initial question included adequately and applicable, Chat GPT response, and appropriately pointed out any errors in the response provided and made those corrections it applicable. the textbook and discussed in class). Relied on information from the internet, andfor outside sources that are clearly not applicable and not supported by in class material. analysis, and either did not cover all potential issues raised, or did not do an in depth analysis of the issues. GPT response, to Chat GPT, or the accurately. analysis, and Chat GPT response). corrected answer) included with submission. Analysis: 0 poor analysis, did | 1-2: Adequate 3-4: Excellent Thorough analysis of | not correctly identify | response. Could response the law and if the law (as stated in | use some more thoughtfully critiqued the issues with the Chat GPT response, in ling with Alberta law, the textbook, and discussions in class