Question Two: Shanetta and Crystal were close friends and always dreamed of filing a limited liability company (LLC) together. Crystal always admired how Shanetta owned her own house, two cars, and a vacation home in Charlotte, North Carolina. Although Crystal didn't have much money or property, their friendship still remained strong. Shanetta decided to allow Crystal to use her vehicle every Tuesday and Saturday to drive to different locations to do hair. One of the primary conditions of the agreement was that Crystal maintain the vehicle's maintenance and keep the gas tank full. The agreement was never reduced to writing; however, it produced a benefit for both Crystal and Shanetta. One Saturday, Crystal was doing Lynette's hair when she accidentally caused a second-degree burn to her scalp. Lynette began bleeding and screamed in pain! Lynette stormed out to the local hospital to receive treatment for her injuries. Thereafter, she immediately called her attorney to ask whether she could sue Crystal, Shanetta, or perhaps even both of them. Please discuss whether Shanetta and Crystal are general partners. Please also explain the relevance, if any, regarding the limited liability company. Question Three: Mark was a Limited Partner in the Cool Carwash business with his friend Jake. Mark had invested approximately $5,000 in Cool Carwash as an investor. Jake was the General Partner and managed the overall business. One day before Mark headed off to play golf, he noticed that Jake was using scrub brushes from Lowes as opposed to scrub brushes from Home Depot. Mark called Jake and asked him to purchase the brushes for Cool Carwash at Home Depot as opposed to Lowes. Jake was not initially on board with the change; however, Mark insisted and Jake made the change. Peter was getting his car washed at Cool Carwash when they accidently damaged his antenna, new paint job and broke his driver side window. Peter decided to sue Cool Carwash and recovered approximately $10,000 in monetary damages against both Mark and Jake. Please discuss the ramifications of Peter's monetary judgment against both Mark and Jake. Specifically, articulate the monetary exposure of Mark and Jake respectively using the applicable law