Question
question : Using our model of choice and conflict explain why an increase in unemployment benefits of $125 per week is unlikely to cause a
question :
Using our model of choice and conflict explain why an increase in unemployment benefits of $125 per week is unlikely to cause a reduction in the incentives to search for work? Would an increase in JobSeeker lead to a Pareto improvement? (Hint: How does it affect the reservation option and indifference curve of unemployed workers relative to the minimum wage).
background info :
From April 2021, the Australian unemployment benefit (JobSeeker) is set to be increased by $25 per week. This is the permanent first increase in unemployment benefits in real termssince 1994.
While advocates have been calling for an increase in the unemployment benefit for many years, critics argue that any increases may disincentivise work for some people. However, research by Melbourne University economist Professor Jeff Borland has shown that boosting JobSeeker would not keep Australians away from paidwork.Professor Borland analysed the effect of the temporary increase in JobSeeker (of $125 per week) that was instituted in 2020 as part of the Federal government's coronavirus response and found that it did not reduce the incentives to seek paid work for unemployed Australians.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started