Question Workspace

The accompanying result table shows the benefit for a choice issue with two conditions of nature and two choice other options:

Territory of Nature

Choice Alternative s1 s2

d1 10 1

d2 6 3

''15''

(a) Suppose P(s1)=0.2 and P(s2)=0.8. What is the best choice utilizing the normal worth methodology? Round your answer in one decimal spot.

The best choice is choice other option , with a normal worth of .

(b) Perform affectability investigation on the adjustments for choice option d1. Accept the probabilities are as given to some degree (a), and discover the scope of adjustments under conditions of nature s1 and s2 that will keep the arrangement found partially (a) ideal. Is the arrangement more delicate to the result under condition of nature s1 or s2? Round your answer in two decimal spots.

The arrangement is more touchy to , as an augmentation of for d1(s2) causes a make back the initial investment between the choice other options, though it takes an addition of , to give a similar impact to d1(s1).

Tendulkar is playing a cricket competition in which every player can play 200 balls and the player

who hits most extreme sixes wins. Tendulkar hits a six on the primary ball, yet passes up the second.

From that point forward, the likelihood that he hits a six is equivalent the extent of sixes that he has hit up until now. For

model, at the third ball, the likelihood is 1/2.

(a) What is the likelihood that Tendulkar hits just a single six?

(b) What is the likelihood that Tendulkar hits 100 sixes?

After the consequences of a chess competition are reported, somebody saw that every player scored precisely 50% of its focuses in games against the three most reduced positioned major parts around there. What number of players partook in the competition if every player played one game against each player? (Note that a success worth 1 point, a draw worth 0.5 focuses, and a misfortune worth 0 focuses.)

Kindly answer very before long will give rating certainly