Question1How does Vitale argue the United States should approach changes to policing?

		An immediate end to the police as a profession
		Investing in social services to handle problems like homelessness and drug addiction
		Replacing police with violence interrupters
		Gradual reforms that increase police accountability

Question2Meares and Tyler suggest that armed officers are not always well-trained to be first responders in certain situations. What is the primary barrier they identify to implementing new policies?

		A lack of data on what would be an effective change
		A lack of support for reform from the general public
		Resistance to reform from municipal governments
		The Kerner Commission

Question3Yglesias criticizes Vitale's position on the grounds that?

		Vitale doesn't respect police enough
		Vitale is mistaken about the history of police
		The presence of police reduces crime
		The social services Vitale advocates for are ineffective

Question4McLaughlin's conservative position on police reform entailed?

		No major changes to policing
		More funding for social services
		More accountability for police misconduct
		Defunding the police

Question5Answer both questions for full credit: Hopefully you found the exchange of articles pretty interesting. I sure did! 1) What arguments did you find persuasive in this set of articles? 2) What are lingering questions you still have (i.e., things you're skeptical of or that you'd like to know more about)?

You will find the answer on this page, open the link and you will find the answer

https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-qualified-immunity-and-what-does-it-have-do-police-reform