Questions 1. The decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal relies upon a variety of sources of law. Identify two sources of law relied upon by the court and identify their weight in decision making. Are they binding or persuasive? Each answer should be between 200-400 words 2. In the Court of Appeal's decision, at para. 4 Sharpe J.A. noted that Tsige "did not publish, distribute or record the information in any way." Should this matter when it comes to liability? Should it matter when it comes to damages? 3. Each answer should be between 200-400 words 4. Explain how this case helps us understand how the common law evolves. In supporting your argument identify one case that we have discussed in class that illustrates how the common law evolves. See Sharpe J.A.'s comments at paragraphs 66 and 67 5. Each answer should be between 200-400 words 6. What does this case tell us about concerns that businesses need to consider when addressing how they handle sensitive information? 7. Each answer should be between 200-400 words