Questions 7 and 8 wee the following additional information. The projoct managor reran the foregoing Solver model shown in queston 3 , substtufing a project goal (cell j16) of 54,53,52,47,46,45 weeks. She found that 46 woeks is the shortest feasible project (for $13,300 additional costs); that is, there is no way to crash the project down to 45 weeks. She collected the following data on the oddtional costs of all possible propect durations, shown in the fable (latt) and the chart (fight). compressing from 50 down to 48 weeks costs $1250 per week of compressign, and from 48 down to 46 weeks costs - $3100 per week of compresilon See that? The correct? There must be an error, we did not expect such a retabonship (because is did not happen in the wedding case in class) We do expect such a relationship in this project In the chart in question 7 , see the 46-week project opben at additional cost $7,100. Fecair the 80/20 nule in project crashing (a0\%, of the maximum times sarvings can be achieved for enty abcut 20% of the mavimum additional cost). Which is correct? This data point (and the ones near in) as an example of the bor20 rule in project crashing This data point (and the ones near it) is a counter-example to indicate that the Borzo rule of projoct crashing is not generally true