Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

QUESTIONS: There are two questions in this assessment task. Students must answer both questions. Students should note question 2 has four parts to it. Two

QUESTIONS:

There are two questions in this assessment task. Students must answer both questions. Students should note question 2 has four parts to it.

Two marks are specifically set aside for English expression and referencing in your answer. This is negatively marked, that is you will lose mark for each error up to a maximum loss of 2 marks.

Make reference in your answers to relevant cases and sections of relevant legislation, when appropriate.

Question 1:6 marks

Frank was concerned about the heavy drinking habits of his favourite nephew, Nick. So, in June, in an effort to break Nick of his routine drinking, Frank offered to pay Nick $1,000 if Nick abstained from alcohol for one month starting on 1 July. Nick had himself become concerned for his health and just before his uncle's proposal, had joined Alcoholics Anonymous ('AA'). As one of the conditions for membership of the AA group, Nick had signed a document promising to use his best efforts to abstain from alcohol.

Nick did not drink alcohol at all during the month of July. He admits that this was more out of concern for his health and the promise to the AA group than any thought of financial reward. However, he nonetheless wants to know the legal position with respect to any claim against his uncle for the $1,000.

Advise Nick fully as to whether he has a binding contract with Frank.

Question 2:

Donald and Hugh were both members of gemstone clubs. They met at a meeting. Hugh had a stand with the sign:

For Sale: Mixed Gemstones at Marked Prices

Donald was looking for a stone suitable for setting in a ring. He selected a stone priced $450.00 and purchased it from Hugh. The stone Donald purchased was later identified as a topaz. Donald wishes to return the stone to Hugh and claim his money back.

Discuss Donald's rights and the legal implications of each of the following possible situations.

  1. Although there was no discussion, both Donald and Hugh believed it was a rough diamond.(3 marks)
  2. Donald believed the stone was a rough diamond but did not discuss his belief with Hugh, who knew it was a topaz.(3 marks)
  3. Donald told Hugh he was pleased to find a diamond. Hugh did not correct him.(2 marks)
  4. Hugh was the club's expert on diamonds and offered the stone to Donald assuring him that it was a diamond, as he honestly believed it to be.(4 marks)

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Family Law

Authors: Jonathan Herring

10th Edition

1292343257, 978-1292343259

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Did the researcher display conflicts and value differences?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Behaviour: What am I doing?

Answered: 1 week ago