Questions;

What do you think the outcome was on appeal? Why?

Locke v. Ozark board of education 970 so 2d 1247 (Ark. 2005). Thank you.

Scaliel et al. v. New York University Medical Cente 805 N.Y.S.2d 62 (N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept., 2005). 9-15 Locke was a physical education teacher and an umpire represented by the Southeast Aabama Umpires Association. The contract between the Umpires Association and the Ozark City Board of Education provided that the city would provide police protection at all games at which the associa- tion's umpires were working. One evening, Locke was working at a high school game and no police protection was provided. At that game, a player's parent attacked him, punching him several times in the face. He subsequently sued the board for fail- ing to provide police protection. The board argued that he was not entitled to sue because he was not a party to the contract. The trial court found that he was an unintended beneficiary and granted the board summary judgment. What do you think the