Question-Set-27 [1] In the Case of the Vintage Car Collector, why would the award of money damages, given the facts of the case as presented in lecture, been insufficient to "make the defendant whole"? Explain. [2] Suppose that while the spare part in question in relation to the Vintage Car Collector case, the same Vintage, with all functioning parts, was on sale for $360,000 on Ebay. Would money damages of $360,000 then have been the correct remedy if the spare part was no longer available due to the misdealing of the dealer? Explain. [3] Suppose that a Chinese factory in China could have reverse engineered the spare part for $15,000. Explain, in that circumstance, what would have been the correct case remedy? Explain