R. v. Stucky, Ont. C.A., per Weiler and Gillese J.J.A., 2009 ONCA 151 (CanLII), 240 CCC (3d) 141

Stucky was involved in a direct mailing scheme centered in Ontario and aimed at subjects in the United States. These direct mailings contained false and misleading representations contrary to section 52(1) of the Competition Act. He was charged under that section in this action.

Explain any arguments that he might be able to raise in his defence. Does it make any difference where his potential victims reside? If this prosecution were unsuccessful under the Competition Act, is there any other legislation that can be used against him?