Rachel and Tim have a three-year old child. One day, the child comes down with a severe illness. The parents take their daughter to the hospital. After being examined, the doctors explain to the parents that their child will die if the blood transfusion is not performed. The doctor does not inform the parents that there is a small risk that the child can develop a negative reaction to the blood transfusion. Rachel and Tim consent to the procedure, but their child develops a severe reaction to the blood transfusion and requires a significant and expensive hospital stay. Which of would be correct

-Yes, the doctor is liable because the doctor did not seek the consent of the child.

-No, the doctor is not liable because the blood transfusion was medically necessary.

-No, the doctor is not liable because the risk of the blood transfusion was small compared to the significant risk of death if the procedure was not completed.

-Yes, the doctor is liable for failing to inform the parents of the risk of the blood transfusion.