Rachel ran a food truck business. Willow told several of Rachel's customers that in her opinion, Rachel was the "biggest jerk" she knows. As a result, some of Rachel's customers stopped buying food from her truck. Rachel is considering a lawsuit against Willow for defamation. Assuming you are Rachel's legal counsel, what is the best and most accurate legal advice?

Rachel has a good case for defamation because she has suffered business damages and pecuniary harm.

Rachel has a good case for defamation because Willow disseminated this information to several third parties.

Rachel does not have a good case for defamation because Willow's statement is pure opinion.

Rachel does not have a good case for defamation because this is mere slander, or spoken defamation, which does not support damages.