1. Re CSR Ltd and James Hardy v Briggs are often mistakenly linked as exemplifying the same point. In fact, they do not. Analyse the legal significance of those cases.

2. Jada is a partner in Bloggs and Co. Bloggs and Co is a partnership in the garage business but unlike most such partnerships, Bloggs and Co has an internal agreement not to sell cars. When might Jada be able to rely on an agreement of that type to avoid liability if a car sale takes place and there are subsequent problems with the sale? Have there been cases which have held partnerships liable for a transaction even although it is questionable as to whether such a transaction is of the type they usually complete? Why have those cases been decided that way? Discuss giving reasons from statutes and cases.