Read Accounting Headline 7.9 and, adopting a Positive Accounting Theory perspective, consider the following issues:
a)If a new accounting standard impacts on profits, should this impact on the value of the firm, and if so, why?
b)Will the imposition of a particular accounting method have implications for the ability of the organization to efficiently provide information about its performance?
Deegan, Craig.Financial Accounting Theory, McGraw-Hill Australia, 2013.
Foster's: less goodwill, higher earnings ANTHONY HUGHES The challenges facing investors seeking a true picture of a company's earnings during the impending prot reporting season were underlined again on Friday when Foster's agged it would report a $1.2 billion reduction in net assets under new accounting standards. The transition to international nancial reporting standards ([FRS) means Foster's net assets will fall from $4.6 billion to $3.37 billion based on its last reported balance sheet, mainly as a result of the internally generated goodwill on brand names not being recognised. The other major contributor to the reduction is the requirement to allow for deferred tax liabilities based on the difference between the carrying value of assets and their cost base. Despite scepn'cism about the likely success of Foster's recent $3 billion acquisition of winemaker Southcorp and Foster's ability to extract sufcient merger synergies, the changes to the reported accounts do not relate to any issues with that acquisition. The brewing and winernaking group told analysts the balance sheet adjustments wouldn't affect its cash ows or ability to pay dividends. removal or gooowui amornsanon charges. Under the standards, goodwill is instead subject to an annual 'impairment test', with the elimination of amortisation expenses boosting reported prots. If the new standards were applied to Foster's half-year accounts to December 31, 2004, the company would have made a net prot of $783.2 million versus the $757 million reported. The reduced asset base reported by companies such as Foster's will also mean they will report more favourable returns on these written-down asset values. The transition to new standards has raised concerns that companies will announce potentially misleading prot numbers and will be reluctant to predict future prots because of the uncertainty around some aspects of the standards. There is also concern about how credit ratings agencies will react to such wild swings in balance sheet values. But the adoption of the standards will make it easier for investment analysts to compare companies to their global peers. In Foster's case, this means investment analysts will be able to better discern whether it is outperforming or underperforming global wine and brewing peers such as Diageo and Pernod Ricard. ABN Amro Asset Management's Mark Nathan said: 'It differs by company and industry. There will be some concern over whether the new standards result in a less realistic portrayal of what's happening than the current Australian standards, but by and large it's an improvement.' However, Goldman Sachs JBWere said in a note to clients that given the shortened period in which companies must now report their results, the new standards 'would only add to the data overload during the last two to three weeks of August'. Foster's closed 2 higher at $5.46
