Read the article from the link and answer the questions

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595618/

Summary of the article

What was the purpose of the article?

What was the perspective of the analysis?

What methods were used for the economic analysis (be sure to include type of economic analysis conducted and from where the investigators obtained the data they used in the analysis)?

What were the major findings of the economic analysis?

Appraisal of the economic analysis

Was a well-worded purpose statement or question posed in answerable format? Explain your answer.

Was a comprehensive description of the competing alternatives given? Explain.

Was the effectiveness of the program or services established? Explain.

Were all important and relevant costs for each alternative identified? And were all important and relevant consequences (or effects) of each alternative identified? Explain your answers.

Were costs measured accurately in appropriate physical units? Were consequences (or effects) measured accurately in appropriate physical units? Explain your answers.

Were costs valued credibly? And were consequences (or effects) valued credibly? Explain your answers.

Were costs adjusted (i.e., discounted for differential timing)? And were consequences (or effects) adjusted (i.e., discounted for differential timing)? Explain your answers.

Was an incremental analysis of both costs and consequences of alternatives performed? Explain your answer.

Was allowance made for uncertainty in the estimation of both costs and consequences (i.e., were any sensitivity analyses performed or confidence intervals calculated when a value was uncertain)? Explain your answer.

Did the presentation and discussion of study results include all issues of concern to users? Explain your answer.

3. What conclusions can you draw based on both your summary and your appraisal?