Read the articles by Khadem ( https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-06/atowhistleblower-faces-161-years-prison-possibility/10872350 ),

and

Ferguson and Gillett ( https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/i-feel-like-i-almost-died-atowhistleblower-breaks-silence-on-facing-161-years-in-jail-20190531-p51ta5.html )

and on Richard Boyle's case of whistle-blowing and discuss the following questions.

1. Does Boyle's behavior of speaking out on his former employer, the Australian Taxation Office, qualify as a case of whistle-blowing? Provide reasoning for your answer.

2. Given the charges against Boyle, do you think he should still be protected as a whistle-blower? Provide reasoning for your answer.

3. Apply the utilitarianism and Kantian theory of ethics to Boyle's case of whistle-blowing.