Read the attached case summary on R. v. Wholesale Travel Group inc. [1991] 3 SCR 154 and answer the following questions: - Questions : 1. In his reasons in R. v. Wholesale Travel Group, Cory J. identies a problem with the \"theory\" that \"regulatory offences and crimes embody different concepts of fault." In your own words and using your own specic example or examples explain what the problem with the \"theory\" is. 2. Provide a specic example of an activity that's regulated by provincial statute and that is not \"inherently wrong" in the words of Cory J. in R. v. Wholesale Travel Group. Summary of R. v. Wholesale Travel Group inc. Facts Wholesale Travel misleadingly stated that they were offering vacation packages "at wholesale prices" and Were charged with false advertising under Competition Acts. 36 (1) (now 5. 52 (1) a). The statutory punishments for the offence Were a ne of up to $25,000 and prison time (s. 37.3 (2)). There were also statutory defences, which included exculpation by demonstrating the accused acted reasonably in the circumstances (5. 37.3 (2) a & b) there was also a requirement of timely retraction (s. 37.3 (2) c & d). The impugned provisions were: 36. (1 ) No person shall, for the purpose of promoting, directly or indirectly, the supply or use of a product or for the purpose of promoting, directly or indirectly, any business interest, by any means whatever, (a) make a representation to the public that is false or misleading in a material respect