Read the case of Gunn v. Gunn on pp. 420-23 of your text and then answer each of the three (3) Questions for Discussion that appear at the end of the opinion on p. 423 and reproduced here:

1. Was there any dispute that Nona was permitted to propound discovery in this case?
2. What was the argument that Neil made that a motion to compel was not appropriate?
3. What does Neil have to prove in order to not be liable for an award of fees under the Alaska statute?