Read the court decision in Hearst v. United States, 412 F.Supp. 889 (N.D. CA 1976) and the Cornell University Law School article. (1) Briefly discuss the expert witness testimonies presented by the defense.(2) What is the basis/bases of the court's decision to exclude the expert witness testimony of Dr. Margaret Singer; (3) Would the court's decision to exclude the expert witness testimony have been any different if Daubert had been in effect at that time and why? (4) Would Dr. Singer's testimony be admissible today under the Frye standard and why (provide support for your position)? (5) Would the outcome of the trial have been different if Dr. Singer's testimony had been admitted?