Read the following article:"Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi-experimental evidence from Italy"Links to an external site.

(Carrieri et al., 2019).Then, answer all of the following questions in your initial post.

• Is this a credible article?Why or why not? (Consider the credibility indicators.)
• In your opinion, why is it important to be able to determine whether information is credible in your role as a nurse?
• In the introduction section of the article, the authors point to something specific that lends credibility to the argument they're trying to make.What is it?
• The authors posit that what two things lead to the decreased rate of vaccinations in Italy after March 2012?
• The authors assert that the causal connection they establish should lead to regulatory standards of what's posted online.Do you think this is ever acceptable?Why or why not?