Read the following Case Decisions from your Text: Ericson v. Playgirl, Inc. (page 378) Tamarind Lithography Workshop Inc. v. Sanders (page 382 and noting that it relays upon Ericson in making the courts decision). After reading the cases consider and respond to the following questions: 1. What was the common "issue" before the court in both cases? 2. What distinctions and/or common issues of fact or law do YOU see between the cases (not just those made by the court)? Which facts do YOU feel were important in the court's logic? 3. Do you like the court logic in either/both cases and do you see the court "reaching" for a conclusion it either or both cases? Explain in detail. 4. Do you believe that there are any practical issues (not just legal but maybe some based in non-legal facts) that may have lead a court to look one way in one case and one way in the other? Read the following Case Decisions from your Text: Ericson v. Playgirl, Inc. (page 378) Tamarind Lithography Workshop Inc. v. Sanders (page 382 and noting that it relays upon Ericson in making the courts decision). After reading the cases consider and respond to the following questions: 1. What was the common "issue" before the court in both cases? 2. What distinctions and/or common issues of fact or law do YOU see between the cases (not just those made by the court)? Which facts do YOU feel were important in the court's logic? 3. Do you like the court logic in either/both cases and do you see the court "reaching" for a conclusion it either or both cases? Explain in detail. 4. Do you believe that there are any practical issues (not just legal but maybe some based in non-legal facts) that may have lead a court to look one way in one case and one way in the other