Read the following fact scenarios and answer the questions posed, identifying if Private Citizen would have a reasonable expectation of privacy under the hypothetical facts,

Private citizen $($PC$),$ non$-$US resident, was charged with conspiracy to engage in money laundering, $18$ U$.$S$.$C$.1956($h$)$ in a criminal complaint. PC finances an opulent lifestyle as represented in PC$$s social media account, through cyber$-$crimes such as$,$ computer intrusions, business enterprise compromises $($BEC$),$ unauthorized exfiltration and sale of personal data, and money laundering, targeting victims globally for millions of dollars. During the course of the trial, the government sought to introduce PC$\text{'}$s cell$-$site location information $($CSLI$)$ to prove that PC was physically near or at the location when the BEC incident occurred. The government obtained the CSLI with a grand jury subpoena pursuant to the Stored Communications Act.

In the hypothetical above, would the court admit the CSLI evidence? Why or why not? In your response, please support your analysis by citing relevant caselaw or holdings from Week $2$ assigned readings. Please feel free to discuss with and advocate contrary positions to those posed by your classmates, while clearly identifying your position and presenting sound legal support for it$.$