Read the following scenario and answer the question. The morning Mary started her new job, the employer handed her a copy of the firm's employee policy manual and told her to look it over, informing her that its terms and conditions would apply to her employment contract. This was the first time the manual had been mentioned to her. Four months later, Mary was terminated without notice on the basis that she was not suitable for the job. The employer stated that it did not owe her any notice of termination or pay in lieu because the policy manual established a probationary period of six months during which time she could be terminated for any reason without notice. Is Mary legally bound by the terms set out in the policy manual? Why or why not? A-A) She is not bound. The employer didn't make her aware of it until after she had started her job. Therefore, she had not agreed to the terms as part of her employment contract. The employer would have to consult with Mary and provide additional consideration in order to change the terms of her contract. B- She is bound. The employer informed her about the manual and provided her with a copy at the beginning of her job, which means she had the information. Since the manual clearly stated the six-month probationary period, Mary has no grounds to argue against it